The PWDVA is primarily a civil law — but it has one sharp criminal edge: breaking a protection order is a punishable offence. This is what stops the Act’s orders from being just paperwork. Here’s exactly what the punishment provisions say.
Dealing with a violated protection order? Ask LawBot → — get clear guidance on next steps.
Section 31(1) states: a breach of protection order, or of an interim protection order, by the respondent shall be an offence under this Act, punishable with:
Any violation of what the protection order (Section 18) specifically prohibits counts — this includes:
Under Section 32, an offence under Section 31 is treated as cognizable and non-bailable — meaning police can arrest without a warrant, and bail isn’t automatically available as a right, reflecting how seriously breaches are treated.
Under Section 32(2), the sole testimony of the aggrieved person can be sufficient for the court to conclude that an offence under Section 31 has been committed — she doesn’t necessarily need independent corroborating witnesses for the court to act on a genuine breach.
Need to report a violation and unsure how to proceed? Ask LawBot → — 10 questions for just ₹49.
Under Section 21, when passing orders related to a respondent’s conduct, the Magistrate can also direct the respondent to undergo counseling with a service provider — reflecting that the Act’s goals include behavioral correction, not purely punishment, though this doesn’t replace Section 31’s criminal consequences for actual breaches.
It’s worth being clear about an important distinction: Section 31’s punishment is specifically for breaching a court order — it isn’t the same as criminal punishment for the underlying acts of domestic violence themselves. Separately, if the conduct also amounts to an offence under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (like cruelty, assault, or criminal intimidation), a woman can pursue those criminal charges too, in addition to a Section 31 complaint for order violations.
| Section 31 (DV Act) | Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita provisions | |
|---|---|---|
| What it punishes | Violating a protection/interim order | The underlying criminal conduct (cruelty, assault, etc.) |
| Max punishment | 1 year imprisonment, ₹20,000 fine, or both | Varies by specific offence, often more severe |
| Prerequisite | Requires an existing court order to have been breached | Can be pursued independently |
Domestic violence related offences, including breaches, generally involve significant court discretion regarding any settlement — given the safety and power-imbalance concerns inherent in these situations, courts are typically cautious about readily accepting withdrawal or compromise without careful scrutiny.
The punishment provisions under Section 31 are what transform PWDVA protection orders from paper promises into enforceable legal protections. A breach isn’t just a civil contempt matter — it’s a cognizable, non-bailable criminal offence, and the aggrieved woman’s own testimony can be sufficient for the court to act. If an order has been violated, reporting it promptly to police, alongside informing your Protection Officer, is the right immediate step.
Get confidential answers to your legal questions in minutes — in English, Hindi, or any language.
Chat Credits: ₹49 for 10 questions · ₹149 for 30 · ₹499 for 100 — never expire
1. What’s the maximum punishment for violating a protection order?
Up to 1 year imprisonment, a fine up to ₹20,000, or both.
2. Do I need witnesses to prove a violation happened?
Not necessarily — under Section 32(2), the aggrieved person’s own testimony can be sufficient for the court to conclude the offence occurred.
3. Can I also file a separate criminal case alongside reporting the breach?
Yes — if the conduct also constitutes an offence under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (like assault or criminal intimidation), you can pursue that separately, alongside a Section 31 complaint. Ask LawBot for guidance on your specific situation.
If you are in immediate danger, contact police (112) right away.
Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult a qualified advocate for guidance specific to your situation.
Leave A Comment